We had talked about having a dog.
We had talked about having a dog.
Posted on December 20, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The University helped put out a call, and we had 122 people show up.
122.
And I've got the Polaroids to prove it.
Students, faculty, staff, alumni. So many really intriguing people.
Ultimately, this was our production math:
34 actors.
22 locations.
Three scripts.
Two days.
Go!
We were also shooting with a new camera, the Canon 7D. In many ways, we could not have produced the volume of shots we did without this camera. It has incredible low light sensitivity, it's extremely portable and quick to adjust.
It's not a perfect video production camera, yet. The Canon 7D doesn't really do audio. So we hired Dan to record sound, and he did an awesome job.
The Canon 7D also lacks time code generation. And the ability to output a live HD signal while recording. But considering what it's capable of capturing, at its size and price point—you can't really argue. There are balances and consequences to every production decision.
We shot in chem labs, libraries, regular classrooms, on top of the Ira Allan bell tower, and all over campus.
We filmed students, faculty, alumni and staff reading one of three scripts straight into the camera. Most were only lit with an LED ring light and sometimes a little Kino Flow back or side fill.
Our DP, Martin Albert, was a saint—working with a new camera, and over 22 set ups in two days. Many thanks to the very patient and diligent crew as well. Our local PAs and grips hunkered down and got work done right the first time.
We also worked with real math geniuses! No fake equations used in the making of these spots.
Now we're finishing up the editing with Ring of Fire post production in Los Angeles. Jerry Spivak, John Myers and their team are hard at work synching audio and helping figure out the cut. Our concept is to layer these individual performances on top of each other, with split screen cuts, to create an individual—yet collective and unified—voice for UVM.
I spent a few days reviewing a couple hundred selects from the shoot. Lots of great performances. Lots of challenging background noises. But the Canon 7D (and its operator, and the talent in front of the camera) really delivered the goods.
Next up, a good 40 hours in post production.
Posted on December 11, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I started blogging just over three years ago.
At first, I could have posted three times a day, several hundred words at a minimum each time. Today, not so much. In fact, today, not at all. I can point to all kinds of practical and pragmatic reasons why I don't have time to write. But I wonder if there's simply a point where writers just stop writing. Anyone else have observations on this?Posted on December 03, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Posted on November 22, 2009 in Collaboration, Television | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: commercial, directing, shoot, spot, University of Vermont, UVM
The primary purpose of being a Copywriter is to create ideas (in any medium) which cause the reaction: "I hadn't thought of it that way before." Your role, then, is to create transformation of some kind. That change, that effect, might be emotional or logical, it might be factual or empathetic. Regardless of style or process, your work creates a shift in perception.
I hope we made that clear tonight.
10 sessions into this course, I'm grateful for the opportunity to work and rework this discussion around what it means to be a Copywriter circa 2009. I really do appreciate your opinions and insights into the process and result of creating advertising ideas, or being a copywriter.
I sense you're enjoying it, too. (And there's a comments field below where you might register some thoughts on this issue.)
Now we've entered the "reality" phase of the course. Now we're going to focus on doing, and quickly—assuming everyone is possessing the growing skills, aptitude and desire to create influential advertising.
Your first assignment is to create print ads for the iPhone 3GS. I'm stipulating "non-interactive" and "non-broadcast" because it forces us to focus on what's in front of us—in other words, if it's not visible on the page, it's not happening—e.g. make your ideas legible.
The presentation below has a few links to click on, and outlines tonight's presentation and the Apple assignment. Definitely check out all the technical specifications around the iPhone 3GS. But don't hesitate to ask Mr. Google what he thinks. Review the competition. Review the punditry. In other words, dig.
As I said in class (not sure if I had the wig and helmet on at that point), our goal is a fruitful discussion of vibrant ideas. We're looking for ideas, as I said above, which cause us to think, "I hadn't thought of it that way before."
Each of you is charged with bringing at least six pungent ideas. Six pieces of paper with one idea on each. If you're smart, you'll bring more than six. Hopefully they fall into one or two distinct campaigns. And from a presentation standpoint, all I care about is legibility—e.g. whatever you've got on the page is clear to anyone who looks at it. Black and White is fine. Drawings and stock photography are fine—but please recognize the trap you can fall into with someone else's images. So use all the tricks at your disposal, you clever art school students. I know you're individually capable and have the resources to deliver coherent ideas.
Next week will be treated as an internal review. Then we'll work together to refine our work.
Happy Halloween.
Posted on October 30, 2009 in Creativity, MCAD, Teaching | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: Copywriting, MCAD, Minneapolis College of Art and Design
Interesting juxtaposition here, with a shared premise of empathy. Microsoft (via Crispin) asks us to see ourselves in their new operating system—even gives billions of us credit. While Apple (via TBWA Chiat Day) suggests Microsoft is just shilling more of the same.
Posted on October 25, 2009 in ad agencies, Creativity, Television | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
"Demand has learned, for instance, that [the keywords] 'best' and 'how to' bring in traffic or high clickthrough rates, while 'history of' is ad poison."
"At the end of the process, the company has a topic and a dollar amount — the term’s 'lifetime value,' or LTV — that Demand expects to generate from any resulting content."
"It turned out that gut instinct and experience were less effective at predicting what readers and viewers wanted — and worse for the company — than a formula."
"...every algorithm-generated piece of content produced 4.9 times the revenue of the human-created ideas."
"This, Reese says, is the ultimate promise of his algorithm: 'You can take something that is thought of as a creative process and turn it into a manufacturing process.'”
"You can take something that is thought of as a creative process and turn it into a manufacturing process."
"That’s not to say there isn’t any room for humans in Demand’s process. They just aren’t worth very much. The average writer earns $15 per article for pieces that top out at a few hundred words, and the average filmmaker about $20 per clip."
"He points out that the focus is off: The rippling water is sharp while the kayaking instructor is slightly blurred. But the company he’s working for won’t care, he says, so why should he — especially for $20 a clip?"
Posted on October 23, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
What is the future of copywriting?
If anyone knows, it must be Elizabeth Sakola and Meghan Casey from Brain Traffic.
We were very fortunate to have these two smart people visit MCAD tonight to share their perspectives and expertise on the art of writing copy in the age of SEO, PPC, UX and a whole host of other acronyms.
Elizabeth shared her thoughts on "Web Writing for Dummies, Smarties, Oldies, and Newbies." Interesting to consider the dualities of copywriting online—is the task to excite, to compel to dramatize (e.g. messaging) or is the task to inform, direct and facilitate (e.g. functionality)?
Then Meghan discussed her background in writing, editing and content strategy. We walked through a diagram from Kristina Halvorson's presentation on content strategy to better understand the various roles and interplay required of writers in the digital age.
Then we had a brief discussion around the increasing rift generated by technology and offshore capability to automate and supplant the traditions of copywriting.
Daniel Roth's piece in Wired, "The Answer Factory: Fast, Disposable, and Profitable as Hell" dissects the success of Demand Media's approach to content creation. As copywriters, how do we feel when our work can be valued at $15 per article? Heck, there's some fellas in India who will write your brand's site copy starting at $4.
Next week we're going to begin a sequence of five assignments, back to back; one per week.
Posted on October 23, 2009 in MCAD, Teaching | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Technorati Tags: Brain Traffic, Elizabeth Saloka, Meghan Casey
Students!
I really appreciated your willingness to step up today and present your brand manifestos for Harley-Davidson. Reading them out loud is good practice for future client and agency presentations.
The work you did will continue to evolve. I encourage you to revisit what you've written and consider what the other students wrote and what we discussed in class—then evolve what you've put down. Work like this is evolutionary. Your first draft is likely one of a dozen, at least, that you'll pursue.
Our brief discussion around the transition from print to broadcast likely didn't do the subject justice. But I know you have access to Writing for Broadcast and Radio classes. The main point is this: Context matters. Who reads your words, what words are spoken versus text, what music you employ. So many components can seriously affect how your words are ultimately understood. It's wise to be aware of the tools, resources and situations at your disposal. After all, you all have Macs.
Next week we'll dig into "writing for interactive," with guest speaker Kristina Halvorson from Brain Traffic.
Posted on October 15, 2009 in MCAD, Teaching | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
"Today's marketing executives got to where they are by executing marketing when it was in its 'classical music' stage. Classical music is a genre that does not take to making mistakes lightly. In fact, there is no room for error in classical music.'"
Posted on October 14, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Robert Grudin: The Grace of Great Things: Creativity and Innovation
Jon Steel: Truth, Lies and Advertising : The Art of Account Planning
Luke Sullivan: Hey, Whipple, Squeeze This: A Guide to Creating Great Ads, Second Edition
Randall Rothenberg: Where the Suckers Moon: The Life and Death of an Advertising Campaign
Robert McKee: Story: Substance, Structure, Style and The Principles of Screenwriting
Judith Weston: Directing Actors: Creating Memorable Performances for Film & Television
Recent Comments